Our Reports

Beyond the Cliff Edge

A Roadmap to Sustainability for London's Black-Led Organisations

Black-led organisations in London drive social change but remain underfunded and excluded from decision-making. The report calls for long-term investment, participatory funding, and structural reform to ensure Black-led organisations can thrive—not just survive.

 
 

About Do it Now Now

Do it Now Now (DiNN) is a pioneering organisation dedicated to empowering Black-led charities, social enterprises, and grassroots organisations across the UK. As part of its commitment to fostering equity and social justice, DiNN launched the London Now Now campaign, a transformative initiative aimed at addressing the unique challenges faced by Black-led organisations in London. Through this campaign, DiNN has created pathways for financial support, capacity building, and systemic change, ensuring that Black communities are equipped with the tools, resources, and opportunities they need to thrive. The London Now Now campaign is not just about responding to immediate challenges—it's about building a future where Black-led organisations are recognised, resourced, and resilient, poised to create lasting impact in the communities they serve.

Contact us to find out more about what we are doing to challenge the status quo and increase opportunities for equitable outcomes in the UK’s Black community.

 

1. Executive Summary

Black-led social enterprises and charities are essential drivers of change in London, addressing deep-rooted social inequities and providing critical support to their communities. However, they continue to face systemic barriers that limit their growth, sustainability, and ability to influence the policies and funding structures that shape their work. This report examines these challenges through four key areas: capacity building, local leadership, advocacy and influencing, and community wealth.

While Black-led organisations are expected to deliver vital services, they are also placed under disproportionate pressure to lead systemic change efforts without the necessary resources or decision-making power. The research highlights a persistent pattern of underfunding, exclusion from leadership spaces, and structural limitations that prevent these organisations from achieving long-term stability.

Capacity Building: Strengthening Black-Led Organisations for the Long Term

Black-led organisations play a critical role in their communities, but unequal access to funding, governance constraints, and financial barriers restrict their ability to grow and sustain their impact. The findings emphasise that long-term, unrestricted funding, participatory decision-making, and access to training in governance, financial literacy, and impact measurement are essential to overcoming these barriers.

Local Leadership: Elevating Black-Led Organisations in Decision-Making

Despite being hubs for leadership and innovation, Black-led organisations often struggle to gain access to decision-making spaces, mentorship, and training opportunities. Addressing these challenges requires peer-led development programs, leadership certification, and stronger engagement with local councils to ensure that Black leaders can shape the policies and funding mechanisms that affect their communities.

Advocacy and Influencing: Shifting Power in Policy and Funding Decisions

For meaningful systemic change to take place, Black-led organisations must have direct influence over funding and policy decisions—not just be consulted as service providers. Research highlights the need for trust-building with funders, participatory grant-making, and long-term partnerships that give Black-led organisations the resources and authority to drive change at local and national levels.

Community Wealth: Building Sustainable Financial Futures

Financial security is essential for Black-led organisations to move beyond survival mode and scale their impact. Yet, short-term funding cycles and exclusion from capital opportunities continue to leave many organisations vulnerable. Research calls for multi-year core funding, revenue diversification, and sustainable business models to establish lasting financial independence.

Beyond the Cliff Edge: The Case for Systemic Reform

This review makes it clear: Black-led organisations are expected to change the very systems that continue to exclude them while simultaneously delivering critical services. Even all-encompassing strategies like London Now Now (LNN) are constrained by the structural inequalities they seek to dismantle.

For true equity to be achieved, funders, policymakers, and sector leaders must commit to structural changes that:

  • Prioritise long-term, unrestricted investment in Black-led organisations

  • Create leadership pipelines and decision-making roles for Black leaders

  • Adopt participatory funding models that shift power into the hands of communities

This is not just about funding—it is about rebuilding a system where Black-led organisations are fully resourced, empowered, and recognised as leaders in social change. The London Now Now strategy provides a pathway toward that future, but it requires collective action, political will, and a commitment to transformative change.

The time to act is now.

 

2. Introduction

The movement to support Black-led social enterprises and charities in London reflects a growing recognition of the systemic barriers these organisations face. The London Now Now (LNN) strategy, launched by Do it Now Now (DiNN), is a bold initiative designed to empower 30,000 Black Londoners by 2030. It focuses on capacity building, local leadership, advocacy and influencing, and community wealth—four key areas that are vital for fostering long-term, equitable opportunities and systemic change.

Understanding the Challenges: A Call for Structural Change

Black-led organisations are at the heart of social impact, working tirelessly to address inequalities and build community resilience. Yet, despite their contributions, they face persistent structural barriers:

  • Funding disparities and restrictive financial models that limit long-term sustainability

  • Limited access to influential networks, leaving them excluded from key decision-making spaces

  • Implicit biases and tokenism, which undermine their leadership and impact

  • Over-reliance on short-term, project-specific funding, creating instability and limiting strategic growth

These barriers make it difficult for Black-led organisations to plan for the future, scale their impact, and fully participate in shaping systemic solutions.

Building for the Future: Solutions That Drive Change

To dismantle these barriers, tailored funding models—including unrestricted and multi-year funding—are essential. They provide stability, allowing organisations to focus on long-term impact rather than short-term survival. Co-designing programs with Black communities ensures that solutions are culturally relevant and truly meet the needs of those they serve. Additionally, capacity-building initiatives that strengthen leadership, infrastructure, and sustainability planning empower organisations to amplify their impact and navigate systemic challenges with confidence.

The Four Pillars of Change

This literature review explores the four strands of the LNN strategy, examining how they create meaningful opportunities for Black-led organisations:

  • Capacity Building – Strengthening organisations through governance, leadership development, and sustainable financial planning

  • Local Leadership – Ensuring Black leaders have a seat at the table and access to training, mentorship, and decision-making power

  • Advocacy and Influencing – Challenging funding disparities and ensuring Black-led organisations shape policies, not just deliver services

  • Community Wealth – Creating financially sustainable organisations through multi-year funding, revenue diversification, and entrepreneurship initiatives

A Question That Drives Action

This review seeks to explore: How essential are capacity building, local leadership, advocacy and influencing, and community wealth in empowering Black-led organisations to create lasting social change?

By examining these key themes, we gain a deeper understanding of how systemic transformation can be achieved—ensuring Black-led organisations are not just included in conversations about equity, but are leading the way in shaping a more just and sustainable future.

 

3. Methodology

This review employs a qualitative thematic analysis to examine the systemic challenges faced by Black-led organisations and assess how capacity building, local leadership, advocacy and influencing, and community wealth contribute to equitable opportunities and long-term change.

Research Design

A comprehensive desk-based review was conducted, drawing from academic research, policy reports, and sector-specific publications. This approach ensured a holistic understanding of systemic barriers, as well as the practical solutions emerging from Black-led organisations and equity-focused initiatives.

Data Collection

This review incorporates insights from peer-reviewed studies, organisational reports, and policy analyses from leading philanthropic and research institutions. Special attention was given to literature that prioritises equity-centred funding, participatory approaches, and systemic capacity building.

Key sources include:

  • Reports from The Ubele Initiative, Do it Now Now (DiNN), ACEVO, Voice4Change, and IVAR

  • Studies on racial equity, funding dynamics, and community-led decision-making

  • Research on participatory grant-making and sustainable organisational development

All materials were sourced from digital libraries, organisational archives, and publicly available databases, ensuring a comprehensive and representative dataset.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Literature published between 2010 and 2024, addressing Black-led organisations, equity-driven funding models, leadership development, and capacity-building strategies. Reports needed to provide actionable insights into both challenges and solutions.

Exclusion Criteria: Works unrelated to racial equity, and materials that lacked empirical depth or relevance.

Thematic Analysis

The four pillars of the London Now Now strategy—Capacity Building, Local Leadership, Advocacy and Influencing, and Community Wealth—served as a framework for thematic analysis. This approach identified key patterns and actionable strategies for Black-led organisations to overcome barriers and drive systemic change.

Key Themes Explored

Capacity Building

  • Strengthening organisational resilience through governance, financial management, and impact measurement.

  • Supporting Black-led organisations with skills in diagnostics, action planning, and sustainable growth strategies.

Local Leadership

  • Empowering Black leaders through certified training, peer-learning initiatives, and community engagement.

  • Strengthening leadership pathways by connecting Black-led organisations with local councils and decision-makers.

Advocacy and Influencing

  • Amplifying Black-led organisations’ voices by fostering trust with funders, building strategic partnerships, and embedding organisations in local ecosystems.

  • Ensuring Black-led organisations influence policy and funding decisions, rather than being confined to service delivery.

Community Wealth

  • Establishing sustainable financial models that reduce reliance on short-term grants and create lasting economic security.

  • Expanding access to local funding and revenue diversification strategies, including social enterprises and investment initiatives.

Synthesis and Interpretation

Findings were synthesised to draw clear connections between challenges and solutions. A comparative approach was used to assess the effectiveness of interventions, ensuring the review provides practical recommendations for funders, policymakers, and Black-led organisations.

Total number of reports and articles reviewed: 22

 

4. Capacity Building

The need for capacity building in Black-led organisations is widely recognised as an urgent priority. These organisations are at the forefront of driving social change, addressing systemic inequities, and fostering community resilience. However, they continue to face deeply rooted structural challenges that limit their sustainability and impact. Key barriers include:

  • Systemic funding inequities that create financial instability

  • Limited access to influential networks that restrict opportunities

  • Capacity constraints that hinder long-term planning

  • Discriminatory perceptions and structural biases that exclude Black-led organisations from mainstream funding and decision-making spaces

Building a Stronger Foundation

Capacity building is not just about organisational growth—it is about empowering Black-led initiatives to lead systemic change. Research underscores the importance of:

  • Governance training to strengthen institutions and leadership structures

  • Financial literacy and resource allocation strategies to build economic resilience

  • Skills diagnostics and action planning to develop strategic responses to challenges

  • Impact measurement and advocacy to amplify voices and influence decision-making

Governance

Effective governance is a cornerstone of capacity building. Reports stress the importance of strengthening governance structures within Black-led organisations to ensure they have the institutional stability to advocate for and implement change.

“The Colour of Money" report highlights the historical role of anti-racist movements in shaping policies but warns that the lack of institutional support weakens their influence. It calls for structured organisational development to ensure long-term sustainability and strategic leadership (Khan, 2020).

Additionally, governance training must address power imbalances in funding relationships. The “Exploring Funding, Power and Participatory Grantmaking” report notes that traditional funding models prioritise funders’ risk management over community needs. By embracing participatory grant-making, organisations can reclaim power in decision-making and ensure funding aligns with their mission (Hamilton, 2024).

Financial Management

Financial resilience is key to long-term organisational success. Many Black-led organisations struggle with short-term, project-based funding that does not support their core operations. Reports stress the need for:

  • Long-term financial planning to ensure sustainability

  • Training in financial stewardship to equip leaders with financial literacy skills

  • Multi-year, unrestricted funding models that allow organisations to plan strategically rather than reactively

The “Shared Futures" report warns that funding should not be reactive or temporary but must be embedded as a permanent investment in racial equity (Runnymede Trust, 2021). Similarly, the Liverpool Charity and Voluntary Services report (2024) highlights the lack of racial diversity in support organisations, which can limit fair access to financial training and resources.

Without adequate financial management training and support, smaller Black-led organisations remain vulnerable to funding gaps and miss opportunities to scale their impact.

Equipping Organisations for Self-Assessment

Capacity building requires equipping Black-led organisations with the tools to assess their own needs and develop targeted responses to challenges. The Runnymede Trust report highlights the need for:

  • Access to high-quality data to identify funding gaps and operational barriers

  • Stakeholder engagement strategies to co-design effective interventions

  • Strategic partnerships to strengthen self-assessment capabilities

The BAMER Hub serves as an example of how practical resources—such as bid-writing support, workshops, and grant opportunities—help organisations navigate systemic funding challenges (Runnymede Trust, 2021). Additionally, community–university partnerships provide access to academic resources that enhance the skills of Black-led organisation leaders and volunteers (Runnymede Trust, 2021).

Impact Measurement

Many Black-led organisations struggle with impact measurement due to limited resources and inadequate support from funders. However, impact measurement is crucial for securing funding, demonstrating effectiveness, and holding funders accountable.

The “How Funders Are Strengthening Nonprofit Capacity" report highlights the difficulty in attributing long-term organisational growth to specific funding interventions. Additionally, organisations often fear that impact assessments could be used against them in future funding applications (Scheid & Helé, 2022).

The “Booska Paper” calls for funders to invest in research capacity for Black-led organisations, ensuring they have the tools and expertise to effectively evaluate and showcase their impact (Armitage et al., 2021).

At the same time, funders must also be held accountable for their funding decisions. The “Delivering Better Funding for Black-Led Organisations” report urges funders to:

  • Publish data on rejected applications to identify patterns of racial disparity

  • Provide detailed feedback to help Black-led organisations improve their applications

  • Commit to greater transparency in the funding process (Rooney & Firth, 2024)

Gaps in Capacity Building

Despite growing awareness of racial funding disparities, many Black-led organisations continue to face systemic challenges in accessing sustainable support. Key gaps include:

  • Lack of unrestricted, long-term funding – Short-term, project-based grants do not provide the stability needed for organisations to grow and thrive (Shared Futures Report, Runnymede Trust, 2021).

  • Power imbalances in the funding process – Traditional philanthropy reinforces bureaucratic barriers that disadvantage Black-led organisations (Lambeth and Southwark Report, 2024).

  • Limited access to decision-making spaces – Many funders control the narrative and fail to recognise Black-led expertise, leading to exclusion from critical funding conversations (IVAR, 2024).

Moving Towards Sustainable Change: A Call for Action

To close these gaps, funders must shift towards long-term, unrestricted investment and decentralised decision-making models. Participatory grant-making, where communities have a direct role in funding decisions, is a powerful way to redistribute power and ensure resources align with the needs of Black-led organisations.

By strengthening governance, enhancing financial literacy, improving self-diagnostic tools, and prioritising impact measurement, Black-led organisations can build resilience and expand their influence—creating lasting change for the communities they serve.

 

5. Local Leadership

Local leadership is a catalyst for meaningful change in Black communities. Black-led organisations play a crucial role in creating spaces of empowerment, advocacy, and support, ensuring that the unique needs of their communities are met in culturally appropriate and sustainable ways. Through leadership training, peer learning, and engagement with local councils, Black leaders are equipped with the tools, networks, and influence needed to challenge systemic barriers and drive long-term transformation.

Leadership Training

Black-led organisations navigate complex systems to advocate for their communities while remaining cautious about collaborating with mainstream institutions due to historical distrust. However, strategic partnerships with local councils and service providers are essential in ensuring Black communities receive equitable access to vital services, such as mental health support.

“The Role of Black-led Community Organisations in Supporting Black Mental Health” report highlights the strategic approach Black-led organisations take when engaging with statutory bodies. Equipped with the right training, Black leaders act as intermediaries, ensuring culturally relevant support while protecting their communities from harmful interactions with mainstream services (Ejegi-Memeh et al., 2025).

Leadership training plays a pivotal role in this process, giving community members the skills and confidence to advocate for systemic change. As one participant in the report noted:

“The whole agenda of research and engagement and working in partnership with the [Universities], that’s core business for us. Why? Because it’s about achieving better outcomes and better understanding for our community” (Ejegi-Memeh et al., 2025, p. 11).

While this report focuses on Black-led mental health initiatives, it underscores a broader reality: Black-led community organisations are not just service providers—they are leadership incubators. By fostering knowledge-sharing, collaboration, and leadership development, these organisations actively work to dismantle structural barriers and create sustainable change.

Peer Learning

Peer learning is a powerful tool for building local leadership capacity. Black-led organisations benefit significantly from connecting with leaders who share lived experiences, enabling them to exchange insights, collaborate strategically, and overcome shared challenges.

The “Delivering Better Funding for Black-led Organisations and Racial Justice” report emphasises the importance of funders recognising and resourcing these peer-learning spaces, ensuring that Black-led organisations are:

  • Included in decision-making processes

  • Equipped with practical strategies to navigate systemic funding barriers

  • Given access to support networks that enhance resilience and innovation (Rooney & Firth, 2024).

Similarly, the “Black-led Impact Organisations: The Lived Experience" report highlights the best practices in collaboration and peer learning. It notes that Black-led organisations that actively share resources, strengthen funding applications together, and work collectively on sustainability strategies are more likely to achieve long-term success. However, many Black leaders still face exclusion from funding processes and decision-making spaces—often consulted for their expertise but denied financial support (Do it Now Now, 2021).

The report underscores the importance of building relationships with local policymakers and funders, increasing transparency in funding decisions, and ensuring Black-led intermediary funders bridge the gap between grassroots organisations and large funding bodies. As one leader noted:

“Conversely, participants with close links to local MPs and councillors are more likely to access local support. They leverage these relationships to gain timely information on funding sources and the support they need to effectively carry out their work.” (Do it Now Now, 2021, p. 24).

Engagement with Local Councils

While local councils theoretically commit to racial equity, many Black-led organisations struggle to navigate bureaucratic systems and are excluded from critical decision-making spaces.

“Exploring Barriers to Funding and Support Experienced by Marginalised Community Businesses” provides first-hand accounts of exclusion, where small organisations are required to partner with larger, out-of-town entities to access funding, only to be later sidelined from ongoing conversations (Spark Insights & Locality, 2023). One participant described this dynamic as:

“They needed us, and yet excluded us” (Spark Insights & Locality, 2023, p. 26).

There is a growing call for councils to move beyond tokenistic engagement and foster genuine partnerships with Black-led organisations. While high-level policies may promote racial equity, many councils lack the resources, frameworks, and the commitment to supporting community-led leadership (Goddard, Dowsett & Miles, 2020, p. 109).

If institutional barriers persist, Black-led organisations must take the lead in driving inclusive discussions on racial justice, funding disparities, and the need for sustained commitments from councils and funders (Armitage et al., 2021).

Gaps in Local Leadership

Despite increased discussions around racial equity and inclusion, Black-led organisations still face significant barriers to accessing leadership development and decision-making spaces. Reports highlight two key gaps:

Limited Access to Leadership Development and Mentorship

Many leadership training programs remain generic and fail to address the unique challenges Black leaders face, including:

  • Navigating systemic racism in funding

  • Sustainability strategies for Black-led organisations

  • Culturally relevant leadership approaches

Black leaders lack access to tailored mentorship, coaching, and peer-learning networks—which are essential for long-term resilience. Additionally, funding constraints make it difficult for leaders to step away from frontline service delivery to focus on leadership development and capacity building.

Exclusion from Decision-Making and Governance Structures

While equity conversations are increasing, Black leaders remain on the margins of key decision-making spaces in the funding and voluntary sectors. Leadership programs often focus on technical skill-building but fail to address the power imbalances that exclude Black-led organisations from influencing governance, policy decisions, and funding structures.

Leadership support must go beyond tokenistic inclusion—it must ensure that Black-led organisations have real power in shaping policies, funding frameworks, and governance structures.

Moving Towards Sustainable Leadership: A Call to Action

To truly empower Black-led leadership, structural changes are needed:

  • Tailored leadership training that centers lived experiences and provides Black leaders with the tools to navigate systemic barriers.

  • Sustained mentorship and coaching programs that build long-term capacity.

  • Decentralised decision-making—where Black-led organisations have direct influence over funding allocations and governance policies.

  • A shift from performative engagement to genuine partnerships—where funders and councils support, rather than control, Black-led leadership initiatives.

By addressing these gaps, Black-led organisations can move beyond survival to leadership, ensuring that they are not only at the table—but actively shaping the future of their communities.

 

6. Advocacy and Influencing

Advocacy and influencing are powerful tools for challenging systemic inequities, securing equitable funding, and amplifying Black-led leadership. Black-led organisations do not just provide services—they actively shape policies, influence funding practices, and push for racial justice.

The “Baobab Digging Deeper" report highlights the critical role of advocacy in empowering Black and global majority leaders, calling for tailored funding, leadership development, and organisational sustainability as essential strategies for tackling racial injustice (Wijeyesekera, 2021). However, to be truly effective, advocacy efforts must go beyond performative gestures—they require long-term investment, policy influence, and a shift in how funders engage with Black-led organisations.

Building Trust and Establishing Equitable Funding Partnerships

A major barrier to effective advocacy is the lack of trust and transparency in funding relationships. Black-led organisations continue to face:

  • Funding models that channel resources through white-led institutions instead of investing directly in lived experience based Black-led initiatives

  • Short-term, reactive funding that does not allow for sustainable growth

  • Lack of trust from funders, resulting in excessive scrutiny and exclusion from decision-making

The “Baobab Digging Deeper” report critiques the structural biases in funding that prevent Black-led organisations from accessing the resources they need. It calls for direct investment, racial equity-focused funding strategies, and long-term, unrestricted funding commitments. Without these, many organisations remain financially precarious and unable to scale their impact (Wijeyesekera, 2021).

The “Racial Justice Audit Analysis of PHF’s UK Grant-making” underscores the role of data-driven advocacy in influencing funding practices. By applying the Funders for Race Equality Alliance (FREA) audit tool, the report reveals disparities in funding allocation for Black and Global Majority organisations compared to their white-led counterparts. It calls for:

  • Long-term financial support to ensure Black-led organisations can thrive, not just survive

  • Increased investment in grassroots leadership to drive systemic change

  • Sustained partnerships with funders that extend beyond crisis-response initiatives (Paul Hamlyn Foundation, 2021)

These reports highlight that advocacy is not just about demanding change—it’s about equipping Black-led organisations with the data, influence, and networks they need to hold funders accountable and push for structural reform.

The Burden of Advocacy on Black Leaders

Many Black leaders find themselves juggling direct service provision, advocacy efforts, and organisational management—often without adequate support. The Locality Report highlights that the expectation for Black leaders to lead advocacy efforts while simultaneously delivering frontline services creates additional strain:

“The concern for me is the onus placed on us as BAME leaders… this is another additional responsibility placed on us and we are still expected to continue to deliver services – much-needed services.” (Locality, 2021, p.9)

Advocacy must therefore be supported structurally, not placed as an additional burden on already overextended leaders. This means funders and councils must actively invest in advocacy infrastructure—providing resources for Black-led organisations to engage in systemic change without compromising their service delivery.

Embedding Black-Led Organisations in Local Ecosystems

For Black-led organisations to effectively advocate for their communities, they must be deeply embedded in local policy and funding ecosystems. However, many Black-led initiatives remain excluded from decision-making spaces and are forced to operate on the margins.

The “Bridging the Gap in Funding for the BAME Voluntary and Community Sector” report highlights the need for Black-led organisations to be fully integrated into local governance structures, ensuring they can:

  • Influence funding priorities

  • Collaborate on policy development

  • Secure sustainable funding that aligns with their mission (Voice4Change England, 2015)

The “Funding Black-led Micro-organisations in England” paper further explores how Black-led micro-organisations—which often face institutional racism and funding barriers—can secure resources by partnering with mid-level and mainstream charities. While this has proven effective in some cases, the report stresses that Black-led organisations must remain in control of their own advocacy efforts rather than being used as tokenistic partners in larger funding applications (Manful & Willis, 2024).

Additionally, the “Home Truths: Undoing Racism and Delivering Real Diversity in the Charity Sector” report underscores the need for:

  • Leadership accountability within the voluntary sector to address racial disparities

  • Stronger representation of Black-led organisations in governance structures

  • A shift from performative diversity efforts to genuine inclusion in decision-making

The report warns that Black leaders must be given real decision-making authority, rather than being expected to play a tokenistic advisory role:

“BAME people asked to play a role should be given commensurate authority to make change – otherwise they are bound to fail.” (Lingayah, Wrixon, and Hulbert, 2020, p.18)

This reinforces the need for funding bodies and local councils to commit to meaningful inclusion, ensuring that Black-led organisations are at the forefront of shaping policies and funding strategies that impact their communities.

Gaps in Advocacy and Influencing

Despite increased awareness of racial funding disparities, there are critical gaps in advocacy and influencing efforts for Black-led organisations:

Lack of Long-Term, Strategic Funding

Many Black-led organisations operate on short-term, crisis-driven funding rather than strategic, long-term investment. Reports such as “Baobab Digging Deeper" and "No More Blank Pages" highlight that funding remains reactive, often focused on emergency relief rather than systemic change.

Without core, unrestricted funding, Black-led organisations struggle to:

  • Build advocacy infrastructure

  • Develop long-term policy influence

  • Retain staff and scale their impact

Underrepresentation in Decision-Making Spaces

Despite growing conversations around racial equity, Black-led organisations remain underrepresented in governance structures and funding bodies. Reports such as the “Booska Paper” and “Funding for BAME VCOs” highlight how Black-led organisations:

  • Compete against larger, predominantly white-led institutions for funding to deliver lived experience based work

  • Struggle to navigate complex funding processes without the same level of institutional support

  • Are often consulted for expertise but excluded from funding opportunities

For advocacy efforts to be effective, there must be a fundamental shift in power—ensuring Black-led organisations are not just consulted but given decision-making authority within funding structures.

A Call to Action: Shifting from Performative Support to Systemic Change

To close these gaps and ensure Black-led organisations can effectively advocate for their communities, funders and policymakers must commit to:

  • Long-term, unrestricted funding models that enable sustained advocacy efforts

  • Greater transparency in funding processes, ensuring Black-led organisations have equitable access to resources

  • Increased representation of Black leaders in governance structures, giving them real influence over funding decisions

  • Eliminating the over-reliance on white-led institutions, and directly funding lived experience based Black-led initiatives

Advocacy is not just about pushing for change—it’s about creating the conditions for Black-led organisations to lead systemic transformation. With the right investment, inclusion, and commitment from funders, Black-led organisations can move beyond survival and into positions of power where they drive the solutions their communities need.

 

7. Community Wealth

For Black-led organisations to thrive, financial independence and sustainable funding are essential. Yet, systemic barriers continue to limit access to funding, leaving many Black-led initiatives over-reliant on personal savings, short-term grants, and unstable funding streams.

The “Black-led Impact Organisations: The Lived Experience” report highlights that many Black-led organisations face significant financial constraints due to:

  • Limited access to unrestricted funding

  • Lack of transparency in funder decision-making

  • Dependence on short-term, crisis-driven grants

To overcome these challenges, organisations must diversify revenue sources, adopt financially sustainable legal structures, and build stronger networks with funders and local authorities (Do it Now Now, 2021).

Achieving Financial Independence

One of the most effective strategies for financial sustainability is adopting alternative Legal Structures, such as the Community Interest Company (CIC) limited by guarantee. This model allows organisations to generate income while maintaining their social mission, reducing dependency on grants and increasing long-term financial security (Sepulveda, Syrett & Calvo, 2013).

Leaders interviewed in the Black-led Impact Organisations report shared why they transitioned to this model:

“We went for the CIC, because we wanted flexibility and also, we are working for our community—so the CIC gives us the flexibility. Now we are doing 80% trading income and 20% funding, because we don’t want to rely on funding and also funding is a lottery; you don’t know when it’s going to come.” (Do it Now Now, 2021, p. 18)

The report also calls for:

  • Greater transparency in funding application processes

  • Detailed feedback for unsuccessful applicants to improve their future chances

  • More direct funding to Black-led organisations rather than relying on white-led intermediaries

Without these changes, Black-led organisations remain excluded from decision-making spaces while their expertise is leveraged in tokenistic ways.

Redistributing Power in Funding Structures

The “Racial Justice and Social Transformation” report underscores the need for funders to shift power dynamics within the funding sector. It critiques existing models that reinforce financial inequities, instead advocating for:

  • Direct investment in community wealth rather than funding structures that perpetuate inequity

  • Participatory grant-making models, where Black-led organisations have control over funding allocations

  • Flexible funding streams that enable long-term financial resilience (Ten Years’ Time, 2022)

A key example of this shift is the Baobab Foundation, which takes a community-led approach to funding. Instead of following traditional grant-making models, Baobab is building a long-term endowment to create financial autonomy for Black-led organisations:

“To make this happen we are building a significant and long-term endowment that will enable us to untether our support to communities from the dictates of the current funding ecosystem.” (Ten Years’ Time, 2022, p. 53)

This reparative and restorative approach provides a model for how funders can shift from extractive grant-giving to sustainable financial investment.

In addition to building an endowment, and running grant-funding and blended finance programmes through its own fundraising, Do it Now Now continues it works as an intermediary grant-maker, providing a pilot space for its clients, Trusts and Foundations, seeking to collaborate on the design and implementation of new grantmaking methodology outside the constraints of their rigid and historically exclusive systems. 

Breaking Barriers to Local Funding Access

Despite contributing significantly to social and economic development, Black-led organisations continue to struggle with accessing local funding.

The “Booska Paper” highlights:

  • Institutional racism within the funding sector that excludes Black-led initiatives

  • The competitive nature of funding, which forces Black-led organisations to fight over small, restrictive grants

  • The need for multi-year core funding models, instead of temporary emergency grants (Armitage et al., 2021)

One of the key learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic was how emergency funding mechanisms exposed existing inequities. As the Booska Paper notes:

“research showing that 9 out of 10 Black and minoritised community organisations were facing closure, influenced their strategic response to the crisis.” (Armitage et al., 2021, p. 7)

While this response led to temporary relief, it failed to translate into long-term investment—highlighting the need for permanent, sustainable funding streams for Black-led organisations.

Diversifying Revenue Sources

Reports stress that financial independence requires Black-led organisations to move beyond reliance on grants. The “A Quantitative Analysis of Emergency Funding" report highlights:

  • The importance of securing access to local funds

  • The need for diversified revenue streams, including social enterprise models, investment funds, and re-granting through Black-led intermediaries (Funders for Race Equality Alliance, 2021)

Additionally, the “Power to Change Social Investment Business" report explores how enterprise development and social investment can be alternative funding models for Black-led organisations. However, barriers such as lower success rates in funding applications and lack of inclusive programme design limit access to these opportunities (Sepulveda & Rabbevåg, 2021).

A key takeaway from the “Delivering Better Funding for Black-led Organisations and Racial Justice” report is that funders must shift away from short-term, performative funding and toward structural investment in Black-led organisations:

“Funding needs to shift from short-term, project-based, and often ‘performative’ funding – which meets the ad hoc, target-driven agendas of the individual funder – into long-term investment.” (Rooney & Firth, 2024, p.7)

Additionally, as highlighted above, funders must commit to providing detailed feedback to unsuccessful applicants, so that Black-led organisations can improve their chances for future funding success.

“In the short term, this would ensure that Black-led impact organisations learn from their mistakes but in the long term improve their conversion rate, aid in the equitable distribution of funds and indeed leverage the large amount of lived experience that exists at the grassroots for social change.” (Rooney & Firth, 2024, p.8)

Gaps in Community Wealth

Despite efforts to increase funding equity, major gaps remain:

Lack of Sustainable, Long-Term Investment

  • Short-term, project-based funding dominates, preventing organisations from investing in infrastructure and strategic growth.

  • Multi-year, unrestricted funding is still rare, leaving Black-led organisations in constant financial precarity.

Structural Barriers to Funding Access

  • Strict eligibility requirements—such as needing to be a registered charity—exclude many grassroots Black-led organisations.

  • Funding processes lack transparency, making it difficult for Black-led groups to refine their approaches and improve future success rates.

  • Larger, white-led organisations continue to receive disproportionate funding, forcing Black-led organisations into unequal partnerships to access resources.

Underrepresentation in Funding Decision-Making

Few Black decision-makers sit on grant allocation panels, leading to assessments that fail to reflect the lived experiences of Black-led organisations.

Without structural reform, Black-led organisations will continue to face financial instability—limiting their ability to grow, scale impact, and create lasting change.

A Call to Action: Shifting from Financial Precarity to Economic Power

To break these cycles of underfunding and exclusion, the funding sector must commit to systemic transformation:

  • Funders must prioritise long-term, unrestricted investment, moving beyond short-term grants.

  • Black-led organisations must have direct access to funding for lived experience based work, without needing white-led institutions.

  • Participatory grant-making models should be expanded, ensuring that Black-led organisations control their own financial futures.

  • Social investment and enterprise development should be supported, creating new pathways for financial independence.

By reimagining funding structures and shifting power dynamics, Black-led organisations can move from financial precarity to economic autonomy—creating lasting community wealth for generations to come.

 

8. London Now Now: A Solution

London Now Now (LNN) is a bold, city-wide initiative designed as a direct response to the systemic barriers faced by Black-led organisations in London. It is not just a programme—it is a strategic intervention that addresses the structural inequities in funding, leadership access, advocacy, and community wealth-building.

By working in collaboration with grassroots Black-led organisations, LNN ensures that solutions are not imposed from the outside but co-created with those directly impacted. The strategy is designed to:

  • Strengthen organisational capacity—providing tailored governance training, financial literacy, and strategic planning support.

  • Enhance local leadership—connecting Black leaders with decision-making spaces and equipping them with the tools to drive systemic change.

  • Expand advocacy and influencing power—so Black-led organisations don’t just deliver services but actively shape policies and funding structures.

  • Build sustainable community wealth—moving away from precarious, short-term grants toward long-term, diversified funding models.

Through these pillars, LNN lays the foundation for lasting transformation, working to bridge the gap between grassroots organisations, funders, and policymakers while ensuring Black-led organisations move beyond survival to sustained, long-term impact.

Scaling Systems Change Through Grassroots Collaboration

The power of LNN lies in its ability to scale impact through collaboration. While individual Black-led organisations have been working to challenge systemic inequalities for decades, they are often forced to do so without adequate funding, infrastructure, or decision-making power. LNN leverages the expertise and networks of these organisations to create a cohesive, city-wide movement that enhances:

  • Stronger referral pathways—so Black-led organisations can work together to support service users without duplicating efforts.

  •  Increased access to funding—by challenging exclusionary funding processes and advocating for unrestricted, multi-year investments.

  • Greater local influence—through direct engagement with councils, funders, and policymakers to ensure Black voices shape policies and resource allocation.

While LNN is designed to create structural change, true transformation cannot happen in isolation. Funders, policymakers, and sector leaders must actively participate in dismantling the systemic barriers that continue to disadvantage Black-led organisations. This means:

  • Shifting from short-term, performative funding to long-term, unrestricted investment.

  • Embedding Black-led expertise in decision-making spaces to ensure policies and funding structures are truly equitable.

  • Decentralising power in the funding ecosystem so that Black-led organisations have autonomy over their futures.

By embedding LNN within a wider movement for racial equity, it becomes a catalyst for change beyond just one initiative—one that enables Black-led organisations to lead on their own terms.

The Limitation: The Burden of Leading Systems Change While Delivering Services

While LNN is designed to be a comprehensive solution, it operates within a deeply flawed system that continues to place disproportionate expectations on Black-led organisations. As highlighted in the Advocacy & Influencing section, Black-led organisations are not only expected to deliver vital services but also lead systems change efforts—often without the necessary resources or support.

This dynamic creates several ongoing challenges:

  • Black-led organisations must fight for funding while also challenging the inequities of the funding system itself.

  • They are asked to engage in advocacy work while struggling with financial precarity.

  • They are invited into discussions on racial equity but lack the stability to fully engage in long-term strategic change.

Even all-encompassing initiatives like LNN remain beholden to the limitations of the very system they seek to transform. Without fundamental shifts in funding structures, decision-making processes, and sector-wide accountability, Black-led organisations will continue to carry the burden of systemic reform while simultaneously delivering frontline services.

Acknowledging the Challenge, Strengthening the Solution

LNN recognises this imbalance and is committed to:

  • Securing long-term, unrestricted funding that relieves the financial strain on Black-led organisations, enabling them to engage in advocacy without jeopardising their service delivery.

  • Challenging power imbalances in the funding ecosystem by ensuring Black-led organisations are not just consulted but actively shaping funding strategies and policy frameworks.

  • Building an infrastructure of support so Black-led organisations have access to networks, training, and decision-making spaces without additional burdens.

As Black-led organisations continue to navigate these challenges, the urgency of structural reform becomes even clearer. The post-COVID landscape, the increasing recognition of racial funding disparities, and the persistent gaps in policy inclusion all reinforce the need for an initiative like LNN to not only exist but to be fully resourced and supported by funders and policymakers alike.

A Roadmap for Future Expansion

While LNN is launching in London, its impact should not end there. The structural inequities that this strategy seeks to address—systemic underfunding, lack of decision-making power, and financial precarity—are not unique to this city.

By proving the effectiveness of this model in London, LNN aims to pave the way for similar frameworks to be adopted in other UK cities. With the right funding, policy backing, and strategic partnerships, this initiative has the potential to:

  • Expand its reach to support Black-led organisations beyond London.

  • Develop a replicable blueprint for systemic funding reform.

  • Establish Black-led networks that influence national policy and funding decisions.

Through this approach, LNN becomes not just a local initiative, but a movement that can drive structural change across the UK.

 

9. London Now Now: A Movement

London Now Now is more than a programme—it is a movement to transform how Black-led organisations are funded, recognised, and empowered to lead.

For this vision to succeed, we must work together. Do it Now Now calls on:

  • Black-led organisations to actively shape and co-own this movement.

  • Funders and policymakers to commit to long-term, unrestricted investment and collaborative decision-making.

  • Sector leaders to champion this work and ensure that it is embedded into broader racial equity strategies.

By shifting from short-term solutions to systemic reform, LNN ensures that Black-led organisations are no longer fighting to survive—but positioned to thrive as leaders of lasting change.

London Now Now is not just a strategy—it is a movement for the future.

 

10. Conclusion

This review underscores a fundamental truth: Black-led organisations are powerful agents of change, but systemic inequities continue to hinder their ability to thrive. Capacity building, local leadership, advocacy and influencing, and community wealth are not just important elements of success—they are essential in breaking down barriers and enabling Black-led social enterprises and charities to build sustainable, resilient, and impactful organisations.

The findings highlight that capacity building is more than operational efficiency—it is the foundation for Black-led organisations to navigate systemic exclusion, advocate for change, and create long-term stability. Governance training, financial management, and impact measurement are crucial tools, but they must be paired with unrestricted, long-term funding and participatory decision-making that redistributes power within the funding ecosystem. Without these shifts, Black-led organisations will continue to carry the burden of systemic failures while lacking the resources to create sustainable solutions.

Local leadership is the key to self-determination. Black-led organisations incubate leadership within their communities, equipping individuals with the skills, networks, and influence to challenge systemic inequities from within. However, exclusion from decision-making spaces remains a persistent barrier. Leadership training, peer learning, and deeper engagement with local councils are critical—but these must be met with genuine opportunities for Black leaders to influence policies, funding decisions, and governance structures. Representation alone is not enough; Black-led leadership must be embedded at every level of the social impact sector.

Advocacy and influencing efforts are vital in challenging entrenched power dynamics, yet Black-led organisations are too often expected to lead systems change while struggling for basic resources. Trust-building between funders and Black-led organisations must move beyond performative commitments—funders must actively invest in long-term partnerships, participatory grant-making, and racial equity frameworks that empower Black-led initiatives to shape funding structures. Without this shift, Black-led organisations will remain on the margins of decision-making, forced to compete for resources within systems that were never designed for them to succeed.

Community wealth creation is at the heart of financial autonomy. Black-led organisations must move beyond short-term, crisis-driven funding cycles to develop sustainable revenue models that provide long-term security. Diversifying income streams, and securing multi-year core funding are key strategies for achieving financial independence. However, these strategies are meaningless without structural reform—funding models must shift away from exclusive, opaque systems that favour large white-led institutions toward transparent, equity-driven investment strategies that prioritise Black-led solutions.

While London Now Now (LNN) is a direct response to these challenges, this review makes it clear that even the most comprehensive strategies remain constrained by the very systems they seek to change. Black-led organisations are not just expected to deliver services—they are also burdened with the responsibility of reforming the structures that continue to exclude them. This expectation is both unfair and unsustainable. True transformation requires a collective commitment from funders, policymakers, and sector leaders to dismantle exclusionary practices, redistribute power, and ensure Black-led organisations have the resources to shape their own futures.

This is a pivotal moment. The urgency of change cannot be overstated. Without systemic reform in funding models, leadership access, and financial sustainability, Black-led organisations will continue to struggle against the constraints of a system that does not work for them. But with intentional investment, power-sharing, and long-term structural change, these organisations can move beyond survival to sustained leadership—driving the kind of transformation that benefits not just Black communities, but society as a whole.

Now is the time to act. Funders, policymakers, and community leaders must go beyond statements of solidarity and commit to funding Black-led organisations equitably, embedding them in decision-making, and ensuring their long-term sustainability. The path to change is clear—the only question is whether the sector is ready to follow through.

London Now Now is not just a strategy—it is an opportunity to reshape the future. Through collective action, meaningful investment, and a willingness to challenge the status quo, we can build a social impact sector where Black-led organisations are not just included, but fully empowered to lead.

 

11. Bibliography

Armitage, N., Zincir Celal, R., Field, Y., Raymond-Williams, R., & Sinantha, F. (2021) Booska Paper: Exposing Structural Racism in the Third Sector. London: The Ubele Initiative. Available at: www.ubele.org/booska-paper (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Do it Now Now. (2021) Black-led Impact Organisations: The Lived Experience. London: Do it Now Now. Available at: https://www.doitnownow.com/blog/insights-into-the-lived-experience-of-black-led-impact-organisations?rq=lived%20experience (Accessed: 04/12/2024)

Ejegi-Memeh, S., Berkeley, R., Bussue, D., Mafoti, W., Mohamad, A., Myrie, U. and Samuels, S. (2025) The role of Black-led community organisations in supporting Black mental health: a Black emancipatory action research project. Ethnicity & Health. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2442323 (Accessed: 12/01/2025)

Funders for Race Equality Alliance (2021) A Quantitative Analysis of the Emergency Funding to the UK Black and Minority Ethnic Voluntary Sector During COVID-19 (March – November 2020). Commissioned by the Funders for Race Equality Alliance, 6 April. Available at: https://www.equallyours.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS-BAME-31-03-21-2M.pdf  (Accessed: 13:01/2025).

Goddard, C., Dowsett, O., and Miles, K. (2024) Equality Impact Investing: From Principles to Practice. London: Dartington Hall Trust. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/602545d8a62dd048f767a742/t/604797560ec9d62c856ebe81/1615304551248/EII-Report-Final-Version.pdf (Accessed: 04/12/2024). 

Hamilton, M. (2024) Exploring Funding, Power and Participatory Grantmaking with Black Communities in Lambeth and Southwark. The Ubele Initiative. Available at: https://www.ubele.org/assets/documents/exploring-funding,-power-and-participatory-grantmaking-with-black-communities-in-lambeth-and-southwark-wr.pdf  (Accessed: 12/01/2025).

Khan, O. (2020) The Colour of Money: How Racial Inequalities Obstruct a Fair and Resilient Economy. London: Runnymede Trust. Available at: https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/61488f992b58e687f1108c7c/61bcc1c736554228b543c603_The%20Colour%20of%20Money%20Report.pdf (Accessed: 22/01/2025)

Lingayah, S., Wrixon, K., & Hulbert, M. (2020) Home Truths: Undoing Racism and Delivering Real Diversity in the Charity Sector. London: Voice4Change England/ACEVO. Available at: https://www.acevo.org.uk/reports/home-truths/home-truths-undoing-racism-and-delivering-real-diversity-in-the-charity-sector-content/ (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Liverpool Charity and Voluntary Services (LCVS), Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA), and Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) (2024) The Disparity in Accessibility to Funds and Support for Black-Led Non-Profit Organisations. Liverpool: LCVS.  Available at: https://www.lcvs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Report-Final-Version.pdf (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Locality (2021) No More Blank Pages: Understanding more about what we need to do to support local organisations working with and led by people from racialised communities. Locality. Available at: https://locality.org.uk/assets/images/2021-05-No-More-Blank-Pages-FINAL-1.pdf (Accessed: 12/12/2024).

Manful, A. and Willis, R. (2024) Funding Black-led Micro-organisations in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 15(2), pp. 317–331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/204080521X16644514950625 (Accessed: 04/12/2024)

Mills, C., Firth, L., & Cairns, B. (2024). A Shared Endeavour: Five Approaches to Assessing the Impact of Unrestricted Funding. London: Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR). Available at: https://www.ivar.org.uk/publication/a-shared-endeavour-five-approaches-to-assessing-the-impact-of-unrestricted-funding/ (Accessed: 13/01/2025)

Paul Hamlyn Foundation (2021) Racial Justice Audit: Analysis of PHF’s UK Grant-making 2020/21. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.phf.org.uk/assets/documents/Racial-Justice-Audit-Analysis-of-PHF%E2%80%99s-UK-Grant-making-2020_21.pdf?v=1714493049 (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Rooney, K. and Firth, L. (2024) Delivering Better Funding for Black-led Organisations and Racial Justice. London: Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR). Available at: https://www.ivar.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Funding-for-Black-led-organisations-and-racial-justice-IVAR-Jan-24.pdf (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Runnymede Trust (2021) Shared Futures: Funders, Funding, and the BME Third Sector – Conference Summary. London: Runnymede Trust. Available at: https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/61488f992b58e687f1108c7c/61e593e70af13f983f414a6b_Shared%2520Futures%2520report%2520v5.pdf (Accessed: 12/01/2025).

Scheid, P. & Helé, K., 2022. How Funders are Strengthening Nonprofit Capacity: Findings from a Field Scan. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Available at: https://hewlett.org/strategy/organizational-effectiveness/ (Accessed: 12/01/2025).

Sepulveda, L., & Rabbevåg, S. (2021). Minoritised Ethnic Community and Social Enterprises: A Literature Review and Analysis of Support from Power to Change, Social Investment Business, and Access – The Foundation for Social Investment. Power to Change. Available at: https://www.powertochange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/PTC_3812_Minoritised_Ethnicity_Report_FINAL.pdf (Accessed: 14/01/205)

Sepulveda, L., Syrett, S. and Calvo, S. (2013) Social Enterprise and Ethnic Minorities: Exploring the Consequences of the Evolving British Policy Agenda. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(4), pp. 633–648. doi:10.1068/c11319.

Spark Insights and Locality (2023) Exploring Barriers to Funding and Support Experienced by Marginalised Community Businesses: Insights, Solutions, and Recommendations for Funding and Infrastructure Organisations. Commissioned by Power to Change. Available at: https://www.powertochange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Research-Report_-Exploring-Barriers-to-Funding-and-Support-experienced-by-Marginalised-Community-Businesses-.pdf (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

Ten Years’ Time. (2022). Racial Justice and Social Transformation: How Funders Can Act. [PDF] Ten Years’ Time. Available at: https://tenyearstime.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Racial-Justice-and-Social-Transformation-2.pdf (Accessed: 12/01/2025).

Voice4Change England. (2015) Funding for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Communities: Bridging the Gap in Funding for the BAME Voluntary and Community Sector. London: Voice4Change England. Available at: https://baringfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Funding-for-BAME-VCOs-Report-July-2015-V4CE-II.pdf (Accessed:  04/12/2024).

Wijeyesekera, D. (2021) Digging Deeper: Insights on Tailored Funding to Organisations Led by Black People and Communities Experiencing Racial Injustice. London: Baobab Foundation UK. Available at: https://www.baobabfoundation.org.uk/news/digging-deeper-a-call-for-scaled-sustained-and-engaged-investment-into-racial-justice (Accessed: 04/12/2024).

 

Join DiNN Community

DiNN Community is a safe and intentional online platform available to all Black individuals and leaders wanting to access resources, network, and share research and lived experiences.

Get in touch with Ozias for more

information

Want to get more involved, ask a question, or share some ideas? Feel free to get in touch.

research@doitnownow.com